running a simulation on the shell

  • alain berich
  • Topic Author
  • Offline
  • New Member
  • New Member
More
13 years 2 months ago #5305 by alain berich
running a simulation on the shell was created by alain berich
Hello,

I am trying to run a study on the shell calling

/opt/SALOME-MECA-2010.1-x86_64/runSalomeMeca -t -u ~/Documents/fem-plate/mystudy.py


but it stops with the error

...
File "/opt/SALOME-MECA-2010.1-x86_64/SALOME/SALOME5/V5_1_3/KERNEL_V5_1_3/lib/python2.4/site-packages/salome/libSALOME_LifeCycleCORBA.py", line 28, in ?
import _libSALOME_LifeCycleCORBA
ImportError: libSalomeLifeCycleCORBA.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory


I added already the path /opt/SALOME-MECA-2010.1-x86_64/SALOME/SALOME5/V5_1_3/KERNEL_V5_1_3/lib/salome/ (this is where the lib is located) to the environment variable PATH but it didn't help. It stops with the same error.

The script libSALOME_LifeCycleCORBA.py, which is calling the library states in the header to modify the SWIG interface file...

Any ideas?
Alain

Edit: I forgot to mention that I am using CAELinux 2010 and successfully ran /usr/bin/python postinstall.py. Also ../bin/as_run forma01a.export works fine.

Post edited by: alain berich, at: 2011/02/14 09:16<br /><br />Post edited by: alain berich, at: 2011/02/14 09:29

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

More
13 years 2 months ago #5306 by johannes ackva
Replied by johannes ackva on topic Re:running a simulation on the shell
hello,
I You want to &quot;run a study&quot;, this means run an analysis which is defined by an .export-file (.export containing the paths and names of the various input und output files). This is simply done by

../bin/as_run YourExportFile.export

YourExportFile.export itself is created (one of several ways) by creating an Analysis case in SalomeMeca Aster-Module (after having created the mesh in the mesh-module and the .comm-file by help of the wizard or with use of EFICAS) and exporting it.

The export-file can also be created or &quot;refined&quot; (more parameters and file definitions) by help of .../ASTK

Johannes Ackva

_______________________________________________________________
Ingenieurbüro für Mechanik
Dr.-Ing. Johannes Ackva
Markgrafenstr. 21
D 91717 Wassertrüdingen

*** Next Introduction Course to Salome-Meca : 16.2-19.2.2011 in Wassertrüdingen ***
*** Next Nonlinear Static Course to Salome-Meca : 24.2-26.2.2011 in Wassertrüdingen ***

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

  • alain berich
  • Topic Author
  • Offline
  • New Member
  • New Member
More
13 years 1 month ago #5315 by alain berich
Replied by alain berich on topic Re:running a simulation on the shell
Hello,

thank you for the useful hints which helped me finally to develop the program a bit further. But probably I wasn't clear enough when describing the problem.

The script mystudy.py reads some geometric points from the HD, generates a solid and a mesh which is at the end of the script stored to a med file. Then I prepared a linear-elastic code_aster simulation which I exported to ASTK. The source of the *.med file is the one, the script stored previously to the HD.

The resulting *.export file, I can successfully run on the command line with
../aster/bin/as_run ~/Documents/mystudy.export

My intention is now to evaluate the result and modify the geometric points according to an algorithm, creating a new, modified solid and a new mesh with the script mystudy.py etc. etc.

If I, however, try to include the command
os.system('runSalomeMeca -t -u ~/Documents/mystudy.py') in the *.comm file, the program stops with the error described above.

If I only skip the -t (thus Salome runs in a window) the computation of the new mesh works fine but the program does self evidently not finish anymore.

Only
os.system('runSalomeMeca -u ~/Documents/mystudy.py &amp;')
os.system('killSalome')
in the *.comm file works. It starts, however, a SalomeMeca window. Does the terminal version of runSalomeMeca work at all?

I do not know the possibilities provided by /ASTK for parameter studies. Does it also support geometric variations following an algorithm which evaluates the results of previous runs?

alain

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Moderators: catux
Time to create page: 0.180 seconds
Powered by Kunena Forum