Salome meca for composite
- lauetcel
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 6
- Thank you received: 0
15 years 11 months ago #3082
by lauetcel
Salome meca for composite was created by lauetcel
Dear Forum
Before to post a tutorial for composite modeling on the wiki, I'm doing some test case to validate my .comm file
I'm in trouble with CRIT_ELNO_RUPT results from aster using salome meca 2009 --> more information at:
www.code-aster.org/forum2/viewtopic.php?id=13177
Did somebody checked aster results in ply coordinate system for ply orientation other than 0 or 90° (used in validation case ssls128a)
and EL not egal to ET
thanks in advance
Lauetcel<br /><br />Post edited by: lauetcel, at: 2009/06/19 13:38
Before to post a tutorial for composite modeling on the wiki, I'm doing some test case to validate my .comm file
I'm in trouble with CRIT_ELNO_RUPT results from aster using salome meca 2009 --> more information at:
www.code-aster.org/forum2/viewtopic.php?id=13177
Did somebody checked aster results in ply coordinate system for ply orientation other than 0 or 90° (used in validation case ssls128a)
and EL not egal to ET
thanks in advance
Lauetcel<br /><br />Post edited by: lauetcel, at: 2009/06/19 13:38
- lauetcel
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 6
- Thank you received: 0
15 years 11 months ago #3107
by lauetcel
Replied by lauetcel on topic Re:Salome meca for composite
I have posted more comparison between CLT software and code ASTER for composite analysis on code aster forum.
I still have some issues calculating stresses in ply coordinate system.
I mean I know how to extract those results but they are not in line with the analytical solution
I would like to know if someone did validate/used this function before (CRIT_ELNO_RUPT)?
I would be really interested to look at a command file that works with plies at 45° to find my mistake
thanks in advance
lauetcel
I still have some issues calculating stresses in ply coordinate system.
I mean I know how to extract those results but they are not in line with the analytical solution
I would like to know if someone did validate/used this function before (CRIT_ELNO_RUPT)?
I would be really interested to look at a command file that works with plies at 45° to find my mistake
thanks in advance
lauetcel
- lauetcel
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 6
- Thank you received: 0
15 years 10 months ago #3163
by lauetcel
Replied by lauetcel on topic Re:Salome meca for composite
Nobody interested in composite analysis ?
Lauetcel<br /><br />Post edited by: lauetcel, at: 2009/06/29 23:39

Lauetcel<br /><br />Post edited by: lauetcel, at: 2009/06/29 23:39
- Joël Cugnoni
-
- Offline
- Moderator
-
15 years 10 months ago #3169
by Joël Cugnoni
Joël Cugnoni - a.k.a admin
www.caelinux.com
Replied by Joël Cugnoni on topic Re:Salome meca for composite
Yes
at least I am interested in composites and shells.. but I have not tested this part of Aster in details, so I don't know how to help you!
My guess is that it may be related to different definitions of orientation angles between your CLT calculation and Aster... or an important bug / inconsistency of the documentation!
... good luck!
at least I am interested in composites and shells.. but I have not tested this part of Aster in details, so I don't know how to help you!
My guess is that it may be related to different definitions of orientation angles between your CLT calculation and Aster... or an important bug / inconsistency of the documentation!
... good luck!
Joël Cugnoni - a.k.a admin
www.caelinux.com
- lauetcel
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 6
- Thank you received: 0
15 years 10 months ago #3180
by lauetcel
Replied by lauetcel on topic Re:Salome meca for composite
Thanks for your feedback
At this step, I'm now trying to check how SIGT,SIGL and SIGLT are calculated by ASTER in the source code
Angle definitions are looking to be consistent with the CLT analysis but I found something strange in the way to transfert stresses from laminte CS to ply CS
More details on Code ASTER forum
www.code-aster.org/forum2/viewtopic.php?id=13177
hope this will be clarified soon
Lauetcel
At this step, I'm now trying to check how SIGT,SIGL and SIGLT are calculated by ASTER in the source code
Angle definitions are looking to be consistent with the CLT analysis but I found something strange in the way to transfert stresses from laminte CS to ply CS
More details on Code ASTER forum
www.code-aster.org/forum2/viewtopic.php?id=13177
hope this will be clarified soon
Lauetcel
Attachment CRIT_ELNO_RUPT_Source_code.pdf not found
- lauetcel
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 6
- Thank you received: 0
15 years 10 months ago #3212
by lauetcel
Replied by lauetcel on topic Re:Salome meca for composite
I have upload on code aster forum modified fortran files that gives good results (to my opinion) when used as "surcharge" in code aster
Any test cases or feedback from other users will be appreciated a lot
Lauetcel
Any test cases or feedback from other users will be appreciated a lot
Lauetcel
Moderators: catux
Time to create page: 0.207 seconds