Help needed: Calculation Error, "SPACER"
- Tom Krivec
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 12
- Thank you received: 0
17 years 2 weeks ago #1931
by Tom Krivec
Replied by Tom Krivec on topic Re:Help needed: Calculation Error, "SPACER"
Hello again,
I tried to apply the 3-2-1 rule (one node fixed at three translations, one node at two, and one at one, + 1 surface loaded with the "pres" operator), without success. Same result ...
I also tried again to clamp one face + "pres" (as in the "PISTON" tutorial which works) , no success, same result. BTW: This were the boundaries I initially started from.
Then I did all the same on a different machine (openSUSE 10.3 with SALOME-MECA 2008.1 stand alone version), no success, same result.
My problem is that I do not even have a strategy to localize the problem, so there are a few questions...
- Are there critical geometry features of the part that could give such results?
- The mesh I use is rather coarse (-> for a first rough estimate). Does it make sense to try a (much) finer mesh ?
- Is there a difference between the available mesh algorithms concerning the stability of the calculation ?
All ideas welcome ...
Tom
I tried to apply the 3-2-1 rule (one node fixed at three translations, one node at two, and one at one, + 1 surface loaded with the "pres" operator), without success. Same result ...
I also tried again to clamp one face + "pres" (as in the "PISTON" tutorial which works) , no success, same result. BTW: This were the boundaries I initially started from.
Then I did all the same on a different machine (openSUSE 10.3 with SALOME-MECA 2008.1 stand alone version), no success, same result.
My problem is that I do not even have a strategy to localize the problem, so there are a few questions...
- Are there critical geometry features of the part that could give such results?
- The mesh I use is rather coarse (-> for a first rough estimate). Does it make sense to try a (much) finer mesh ?
- Is there a difference between the available mesh algorithms concerning the stability of the calculation ?
All ideas welcome ...
Tom
- Tom Krivec
- Topic Author
- Offline
- New Member
-
Less
More
- Posts: 12
- Thank you received: 0
17 years 1 week ago #1944
by Tom Krivec
Replied by Tom Krivec on topic Re:Help needed: Calculation Error, "SPACER"
Hi,
after days of search for the error I finally found it (at least I think so ... ):
The step file I used as starting point for the simulation resulted in a "compound" when imported into SALOME geometry module. Directly meshing the "compound" led to the described failure.
"Exploding" the compound into solids gave two single solids. These two solids I fused (boolean operation) and then I did the meshing, starting with the new, fused solid.
After setting the boundaries (1 point fixed in all 3 translational DOFs, and the support faces fixed in z-Direction with dz=0 + pressure applied on the designated face) the calculation case was carried out without any problems.
Thanks for your input and help,
best regards, Tom
after days of search for the error I finally found it (at least I think so ... ):
The step file I used as starting point for the simulation resulted in a "compound" when imported into SALOME geometry module. Directly meshing the "compound" led to the described failure.
"Exploding" the compound into solids gave two single solids. These two solids I fused (boolean operation) and then I did the meshing, starting with the new, fused solid.
After setting the boundaries (1 point fixed in all 3 translational DOFs, and the support faces fixed in z-Direction with dz=0 + pressure applied on the designated face) the calculation case was carried out without any problems.
Thanks for your input and help,
best regards, Tom
Moderators: catux
Time to create page: 0.128 seconds